Five platforms now sell AI contract reading to coordinators

ListedKit, Rebillion.ai, DocJacket, Trackxi and Nekst all shipped AI tooling between 2024 and 2026. No standard governs what the extraction may be trusted to do.

Key points

ListedKit markets an AI assistant branded Ava.

Rebillion.ai, DocJacket, Trackxi AI and Nekst AI all ship AI features aimed at coordinators.

Trackxi launched AI tooling in April 2025.

There is no industry standard for how contract extraction should be validated or cited.

The practical test is whether the tool shows the page it read a date from.

The most repetitive part of a coordinator's week is reading a signed contract and typing what it says into a system that will then remind them about it. It was always the obvious thing to automate, and between 2024 and 2026 a cohort of platforms did.

ListedKit markets an assistant branded Ava. Rebillion.ai has built its positioning entirely around AI coordination. DocJacket ships AI extraction alongside an unusually heavy editorial operation. Trackxi launched AI tooling in April 2025. Nekst, founded by Brett Keppler, ships Nekst AI. These are not the same product, but they are pitched at the same job.

The unresolved question

Nobody has agreed what extraction may be trusted to do. A contract date is not a fact in a database; it is the output of a clause, sometimes a conditional one. The classic example is a deadline expressed as ten days from the effective date, where the effective date is itself defined elsewhere in the document and the day count may or may not exclude weekends depending on the form.

Get that wrong and the coordinator has not saved time. They have introduced a deadline error into a file, with the added hazard that the error arrived looking authoritative.

The test that matters

There is a simple functional standard the market has arrived at without formalising: does the tool show you where it read the value from. An extraction that returns a closing date is a guess. An extraction that returns a closing date with a page and clause reference, and a confidence marker on the ones it is unsure about, is a draft a coordinator can check in seconds.

Does every extracted value cite a page or clause in the source document?

Are low-confidence values visibly flagged rather than silently included?

Does anything reach the calendar before a human approves it?

Is AI usage priced into the plan, or metered separately in a way that punishes a busy month?

Are client documents excluded from model training, in writing?

Those five questions are the ones TC Bulletin will put to every platform in this category, and we will publish the answers as we get them.

Where the older platforms sit

The incumbents are not standing still. SkySlope has built its compliance positioning around its Smart Suite and Smart Assist tooling. Qualia, on the title and escrow side, has shipped AI-adjacent product and publishes steadily on wire fraud and regulatory topics. Dotloop, zipForm and TransactionDesk sit inside larger corporate structures where roadmap decisions are made further away from the coordinator.

Vendor sources referenced

ListedKit

Rebillion.ai

DocJacket

Trackxi

Nekst

SkySlope

Qualia Insight

Sources cited

Trackxi

ListedKit

Nekst